![design concepts laminator sleeve pouch design concepts laminator sleeve pouch](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0140/9652/files/Laminating-Pouches-01.jpg)
I’m here bc like an idiot I left my plastic laminator on top of the toaster over which melted it shut where the paper feeds iron was the first to come to mind so I googled it& found this.
DESIGN CONCEPTS LAMINATOR SLEEVE POUCH PLUS
And if you really want to get technical about a carbon footprint…how much more energy was used to produce, package, and ship that laminating machine, plus the energy used to advertise it and by the store selling it and by you driving to go get one….not to mention what happens to it all when it’s trash… than you would use if you used the iron you already own? I’m thinking you’d have to be laminating all day long to make the iron a more expensive/consumptive alternative. (I hope that makes sense!) Seems to me you’d really have to laminate a lot to make the iron a more expensive alternative. But if the electric to run the iron to laminate one sheet costs X, then how many X’s would it take to add up to the cost of a laminating machine. In the interest of being frugal, I’m wondering just how many items you’d have to laminate with an iron to make the electric bill higher than the cost of a laminating machine? Both ways require the laminating sheets, so that’s a break even deal. I know it’s easy to say, eh, they’re all around 1000W give or take a couple hundred, what’s the difference? But if you really start to think about it and do the math, there is a huge difference, and a lot of energy/money to be saved. the laminating machine is correct, I also don’t think that generally energy saving appliances like microwaves and toasters should be lumped in with what most will agree are huge energy wasters like irons and hair dryers. So anyway, while I don’t believe Wayne’s analysis of what is more efficient/inexpensive in the case of the iron vs. I understand some people don’t care about their carbon footprint or if their energy bill is a little higher, but seeing how this is a site about being frugal, I think it’s worth a mention that my wife and I are now only paying a fifth of what we did a few years ago for our energy bill since we started really studying our energy usage and seeing what we could cut out or replace with alternatives.
DESIGN CONCEPTS LAMINATOR SLEEVE POUCH PORTABLE
No one is saying you “shouldn’t use” any of these appliances, especially because some of them don’t have greener alternatives yet (you could save a little bit of energy by using a portable garment steamer instead of an iron, but not much), but it couldn’t hurt to be a little bit more aware of the actual energy use of your appliances and what the alternatives are.
![design concepts laminator sleeve pouch design concepts laminator sleeve pouch](https://i.ebayimg.com/thumbs/images/g/cSQAAOSw~O1a0ob4/s-l200.jpg)
Which do you think is more “worth it?” And while it is true that microwaves range between 7W, they are usually also only used for a fraction of the time of a hair dryer or an iron (I don’t know if you know anyone with an office job, but it actually does take me a little less than an hour to iron two weeks worth of work shirts) and are also much more efficient than their counterparts– the stovetop and the oven (unless of course you wanted to use a sun oven or a compact jet-type stove like the bioLite!)– because it takes so much less time to cook in a microwave. Most people actually do recognize a hair dryer as a high-energy appliance… in fact, in the time it would time my wife to dry her hair (~15 minutes), she would have used enough energy to power the computer I’m using to write this comment for six whole hours.
![design concepts laminator sleeve pouch design concepts laminator sleeve pouch](https://www.laminationdepot.com/images/APLULTRAX10_01.jpg)
It does not store any personal data.I don’t agree with Wayne about the laminating machine saving money or time over the iron, but I just wanted to mention that your comparison of irons to hair dryers and microwaves doesn’t really make much sense, as they are all used for different purposes and for different amounts of time. The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly.